• We’re not 100% convinced by isCacheableVoters’s default “AND” op, and the needed for checking getVoters().length == 0 - i.e we see why you had to do it, but this is yet another thing we don’t like about the whole voting API.
  • The commit to CacheModuleVersionHandler is “full" of codestyle changes. Please avoid.
  • HasVariantVoter needs javadoc
  • HasVariantVoter is not-ed in config - maybe it’s easier to read if it’s positive ? WDYT about rename to IsCacheable (in the p13n packages) and avoid the “not” ?
  • HasVariantVoter extends AbstractBoolVoter<Object> -> should be typed
  • This lead us to see that the passed value (CachedEntry) is actually not used by voter
    • maybe these Voters could vote on AggregationState instead of CacheEntry ?
    • if not, then when using Provider<AggState>, name it aggstateProvider (injected at different scope)
  • PersonalizationIntegrationModuleVersionHandler : avoid bootstrap file for 2-properties node of isNotVariant, use NodeBuilder or simple tasks instead.
Change By: Roman Kovařík (29/Oct/14 8:41 AM)
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved Reopened
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



----------------------------------------------------------------
For list details, see: http://www.magnolia-cms.com/community/mailing-lists.html
Alternatively, use our forums: http://forum.magnolia-cms.com/
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <dev-list-unsubscr...@magnolia-cms.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to