On May 29, 2007, at 22:15 , Boris Kraft wrote:
I agree that this is a risk. Its also complicated for users (admins), since they need to know all the modules they need to install. I personally would agree that at least some modules lend themselves to be general purpose. Imaging seems a good example to me. It would be easy to understand that if I need "advanced" imaging, all I need is that one module.

Just my two cents. If you look at Typo3, they have several thousand modules, and its really hard to figure out which one you want.

I would agree.. in general. But in this particular case, I'd say that until someone (Oliver? :)) actually provides more functionality, we keep a more specific name. When that happens, we could merge that in a single module if it makes sense (for code reuse, usage simplicity or the fact the features are similar and used in a similar way)

Today I had a closer look at a collection of java image filers [1], and since these are mostly simple beans, it would seem pretty trivial at first sight to use content2bean to configure them, etc. However, the main question will still be where/how to configure them, does it make sense to have the settings (in the dialogs or in module/config), etc etc. And I can already see this bringing bigger / longer term questions, too :) I personally have no time on my planning for thinking about this and implementing it, but if someone does, feel free to get in touch and we could chat ideas over.

All this to say, that, yes, having a more "generic" module name is nice, but unless the actual module does something more generic, I don't see the point. Since we use svn, it's not like we're bound to keep the name forever like we would somehow be with cvs :) (I know it sounds contradictory to my initial request asking for a better name, and thanks for bringing the point ! )

Cheers

g



[1] http://www.jhlabs.com/ip/filters/index.html

----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to