At 08:44 PM 8/9/00 +0000, you wrote: >Charles, > >While I think this is a great idea - and I mean that, I'm not just being >obsequious - I also think that you're mixing up your priorities. The most >important next step for OpenSRS should be to document the API completely, >from start to finish. This is going to happen. I have a draft in my hands. Ross had mentioned possibly releasing it this week - I won't be so bold (like to pleasantly surprise as oppose to disappoint), but this is very close. So, assuming we have a full protocol specification (API)... :) Regards, sA Scott Allan Director OpenSRS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Modular Client Code Proposal Charles Daminato
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal WebWiz
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Joe Rhett
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Lance Woodson
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Charles Daminato
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Christopher Masto
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Scott Allan
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal storage
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Scott Allan
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Joe Rhett
- RE: Modular Client Code Proposal David Harris
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal L.C.
- RE: Modular Client Code Proposal David Harris
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal Joe Rhett
- RE: Modular Client Code Proposal Lynn W. Taylor
- Re: Modular Client Code Proposal L.C.
