Does the 2.21 still have to many bugs to implement? Should I just install
the 2.03 code instead?
Registration Error
The error which occurred was:
Invalid domain syntax for two.com (Invalid domain format (try something
similar to "yourname.com")
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Savino
CEO
2Tone Web Design
"The Only Limitation Is The Imagination"
Phone: 727-343-4426
Cell: 727-481-3180
Fax: 815-550-7317
http://www.2tonewebdesign.com
http://www.2tonedomains.com
----- Original Message -----
From: WebWiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Tom Savino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: Registration Error
> As I recall, if you are strictly following the RFCs, it's not valid to
have
> a domain name that starts with a numeric character...perhaps the script is
> screening the domain name for an initial numeric character?? Of course,
> there are plenty of them out there -- 3com.com, 3mc.com and
> 2tonewebdesign.com to name a few.
>
> Weird thing is I tried this out on both my production server (V2.0.3) and
on
> my test server (V2.2), and wasn't able to reproduce it.
>
> Regards,
> Eric Longman
> Atl-Connect Internet Services
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
> | Atl-Connect Internet Services http://www.atlcon.net |
> | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230-288 770 590-0888 |
> | Marietta, GA 30064-1685 [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> +-------------------------------------------------------+
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Savino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 1:08 AM
> Subject: Registration Error
>
>
> Anybody got a clue? I tried to look it up in the list but can't find it, I
> think this was address before I am using 2.21
> -------------------------------------------
> Registration Error
> The error which occurred was:
> Invalid domain syntax for 2tonedomains.com (Invalid domain format (try
> something similar to
> "yourname.com")
> -------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tom Savino
> CEO
> 2Tone Web Design
> "The Only Limitation Is The Imagination"
> Phone: 727-343-4426
> Cell: 727-481-3180
> Fax: 815-550-7317
> http://www.2tonewebdesign.com
> http://www.2tonedomains.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 10:57 AM
> Subject: Re: .CA Names and Advanced Registration
>
>
> >
> > > > Current design spec dictates we will not allow duplicate
submissions.
> Since
> > > > we will be putting the money on hold until the registration
> definitively
> > > > completes or fails, speculation should be somewhat reduced.
> > >
> > >As far as I can see then, the only big issue regarding .ca advanced
> > >registrations is going to be refunding those users whose registration
> fails.
> > >
> > >As most RSPs probably process transactions through credit cards, it is
A
> > >Very Bad Idea to process large numbers of transactions that have a
> potential
> > >to be refunded. Merchant banks do not like to see a merchant's
chargeback
> > >level rise beyond a certain percentage, and the banks have become much
> more
> > >serious recently about suspending merchant accounts with high
chargeback
> > >levels. I think I read somewhere recently that a chargeback level as
low
> as
> > >1% may jeopardize your merchant account.
> >
> > right - so as per your more recent post, you do not perform a charge
back.
> >
> > >One possible scenario for RSPs is that a high number of advanced
> > >registrations fail. Expect it to be so - many end-users, in order to
> ensure
> > >a greater likelihood of being granted a desired .ca name, will probably
> > >attempt to Advanced Register the desired name at as many Registrars as
> > >possible to ensure that the name goes through at one of the Registrars.
> >
> > It is a good idea to be aware of this up front - excellent thinking.
> >
> > >This could leave you with a cash crunch, if you have a large number of
> > >advanced registrations, increase your account balance at OpenSRS to
cover
> > >them, then find that a large number of registrations failed. Your
> customers
> > >will likely ask for a refund immediately, but you will then have a
large
> > >percentage of the revenues from those advanced registrations tied up as
> an
> > >account balance at OpenSRS...
> > >
> > >OpenSRS does state that it will refund unused balances
> > >(http://www.opensrs.org/Payment_FAQ.shtml#refund ), but it may take as
> long
> > >as 2 weeks according to their documentation.
> > >
> > >Does this statement refer to RSPs opting out of the system or does it
> apply
> > >to any active RSP who needs to reduce their active balance?
> >
> > We will accommodate active RSPs as well...
> >
> > If this becomes a large issue, we can manage around it.
> >
> > sA
> > Scott Allan
> > Director OpenSRS
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
