On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Charles Daminato wrote: > We're working on a solution that will not drastically alter the API > (we do have many legacy resellers to keep in mind)
Understood. > However, as an enhancement (addition, not alteration) to the API, I'll > see what I can do here :) Having a slow compatible path and a fast incompatible path would certainly encourage the legacy folks to upgrade. Bru-hahahaha! -- </chris> "Petty bureaucrat... we'll see how he feels after he's been inside our giant clothes dryer and his very garments imprison him like a mummy!" "ZORT!! Then we can stick tickly things in his nose, right Brain?" "Let's not be vindictive, Pinky."
