Let me answer this for Joey. The short answer to your question is: The RCL continues to be the supported version of the client code.
I recently moved from Development into Product Management, and one of my most important objectives is to develop specifications for a new architecture of the client code (RCL) and have the new code built. We are redesigning the client code to incorporate some of the best features of the Source Forge version. Joey has briefed me on all of the requests by the development community, but feel free to contact me off the list and submit your suggestions. Presently, we have prioritized the enhancements and defined the business requirements. The next step is a functional spec. This whole exercise is a significant effort and it will be the second part of 2004 before we release new RCL architecture. Zeljko Dimic Technical Product Manager -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joe Rhett Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:10 PM To: Joey deVilla Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Time is up! Verdict please... Hey Joey. It's been 4 months since you said you were going to make a determination on whether we go to the SF client base, or drop it entirely. Can we get a judgement here? And no, "we're keeping both but ..." isn't an acceptable answer. I don't care how you do it, but a client which provides the ability to plug in a payment interface that can survive minor upgrades (aka hooks or whatever) is necessary. Tell us how you will be providing it. I personally don't care which way you go, I just want a SINGLE answer. -- Joe Rhett Chief Geek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isite Services, Inc.
