Hi Colin, The only difference between the two domains in your example is that one is already under the Tucows tag and the other isn't. There is a slightly different logic path in how the system gives such a response. Based on what I was able to dig up I would expect that regardless of where the domain "lives", the system would return the same message for both, namely this one:
[transferable] => 0 [reason] => Domain status REGISTRAR-LOCK does not allow for transfer I've logged it as a bug. Unless someone in dev can give me reason why it is handled differently this will be worked out. Thanks! James On 8/3/04 1:26 PM, "Colin Viebrock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are trying to figure out if a domain name is transferrable to us, > using the "check_transfer" command. > > Some domains, like PORTPERRYSTAR.COM, return the following attributes: > > [transferrable] => 0 > [reason] => Domain status doesn't allow for transfer > > While others, like GOOGLE.COM, return: > > [transferrable] => 0 > [reason] => Domain status REGISTRAR-LOCK does not allow for transfer > > As far as I can tell, the domain that returns the first attributes is > also REGISTRAR-LOCKED, so I'm wondering why Tucows is providing a > different message for it. > > - Colin > James M Woods Product Manager -TLDs Tucows Inc. 416 538 5453
