Taco Hoekwater wrote:

That one doesn't actually work (it is never called). There are
interesting issues when it comes to the timing of this, and that made
me stop when I first looked at it (seems like a long time ago).
The original goal of this callback was to provide a method to create
missing glyphs on the fly, but it was surprisingly hard to find the
right time to do that check.

Just after hyphenation and before the kerning/ligaturing step would
be a good moment, but since those are all callbacks now themselves,
maybe I should just forget about char_exists completely.

if i remember right we dropped the idea char_exists in favour of the ability to add (virtual) characters to a font (only once per char) but we put than wish on the long term wishlist

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-luatex mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex

Reply via email to