Yue Wang wrote: > Hi, Taco: > > > After my testing the context/experimental with the trunk version of LuaTeX, > the memory usage for loading CJK fonts are much lower than before > (300MB vs. 850MB on Adobe Songti Std Light, Windows XP), > and the loading time is also shorter, too. So thanks a lot for the work! > I think many users on the list will be happy too (like Wolfgang, > Yanrui Li, Dr. Kim, Longming Wang, etc...)
This patch was coded at the KTS meeting in Seoul. As far as I know, it is faster only because there is less swapping involved and/or malloc() is more efficient. The exact same amount of work is done as before. In particular, the glyph boundingboxes are still correctly calculated. Best wishes, Taco _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list [email protected] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
