Hi Peter,
Can you have a look at the CXXLD.sgh issue reported below?
The bug that is referred to is here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/686381
and reading that will (hopefully) explain enough of the missing
quotations from the email exchange below.
Best wishes,
Taco
On 12/20/2010 02:13 PM, Jani Monoses wrote:
On 12/20/2010 02:41 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 12/20/2010 01:18 PM, Jani Monoses wrote:
Hello,
luatex fails to build on Ubuntu Natty
Note that the current luatex is 0.65.0 (but it is unlikely
that that makes any difference).
Why is a static link needed btw? Does --disable-runtime-cxx-hack
have some drawbacks?
Luatex is normally built as part of texlive, and the texlive
distribution contains precompiled binaries for various platforms.
libc++ and the gcc libraries are linked statically to make the
generated binaries more portable, so no, for a local binary
you can disable the hack.
ok, thanks.
According to a gcc involved commenter on the bugreport I linked to,
the CXXLD.sh generation itself is incorrect, as he could fix the build
by omitting some of the flags.
So that still may be a luatex specific issue.
Jani
However, I cannot guarantee that that fixes the problem. If a
symbol cannot be found using static linking, I do not have a lot
of faith in the runtime system being able to find it. You may
have to define -fno-exceptions in the CPPFLAGS instead.
Best wishes,
Taco
_______________________________________________
dev-luatex mailing list
dev-luatex@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
