On 9/1/2019 3:39 PM, Marcel Fabian Krüger wrote:
fixed in next luatex but in a different way as we then also need to
support deeper nesting
\toks2{\def\deepermacro{deeper}}
\toks0{\def\innermacro{inner}\def\deepermacro{weird}\directlua{tex.runtoks(2)}}
\edef\outermacro{outer\directlua{tex.runtoks(0)}}
\meaning\innermacro \par
\meaning\deepermacro\par
\meaning\outermacro \par
done
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r7186 | luigi.sca...@gmail.com | 2019-09-01 15:25:05 +0200 (Sun, 01 Sep
2019) | 1 line
permit nested runtoks in more complex situations of nesting (HH)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Awesome, thank you.
One further question out of academic interest: What was the problem with
my former proposed fix? It seems to give the right result in your example
and I currently can't see why it would have problems with nesting.
It's more a matter of symmetry ... to have it in the end_local handler
so that it happens at the same level. (Ok, I could change that but first
I need to ponder other side effects like node being produced when in an
edef. I knew that was an issue and could live with that because of
chicken-egg issues, but still. Maybe some variants in due time. Low
priority stuff.)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-luatex mailing list
dev-luatex@ntg.nl
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
