Hi all, I would say that *if* the majority of the team agreed to this, let's move forward with this name.
I know it's unlikely we're going to have everyone happy with a project name. The point of 'it could be a product name' is very subjective given some very strange startup product names out there that I would clearly thought were internal names. :) Chris On Feb 20, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Martin Thomson <m...@mozilla.com> wrote: > I think that this fails one of the basic criterion that Andreas laid out. > Namely, that it can very easily be mistaken for a product name. I can > imagine taking this to a public announcement. > > On 2014-02-20, at 00:57, Romain Testard <rtest...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Thanks for your input regarding re-naming the project. >> This came to a draw between Loop and Archway and we decided that Loop is a >> good name for the WebRTC application project (the product name will be >> different). >> Loop is concise, fits all of Andreas requirements and can be turned into a >> verb just like you do with Skype (Loop me in). >> >> So please use "Loop" to name the project moving forward - a Wiki using the >> Loop name will be created and I'll be in touch with some of you to get that >> going. >> >> If you see any issues with it please let me know! >> >> Romain >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-media mailing list >> dev-media@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media > _______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list dev-media@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
