On 10/17/2012 6:55 PM, Dave Mandelin wrote:
Following the recent discussion about PGO, I really wanted to understand what benefits 
PGO gives Firefox on Windows, if any--I was skeptical. Rafael (IIRC) posted some Talos 
numbers, but I didn't know how to interpret them. So I decided to try a few simple 
experiments to try to falsify the hypothesis that "PGO has user-perceivable 
benefits".

Experimental setup: Windows builds from 
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5f4a6a474455 on a Windows 7 Xeon. I 
took opt and pgo builds from the tbpl links.

Experiment 1: cold startup time

   I used a camera to measure time from pressing enter on a
   a command line until the Fx window was completely shown.

  results:
   opt: 3.025 seconds
   pgo: 1.841

   - A clear win for PGO. I'm told that there is a startup
     time optimization that orders omni.ja that only runs
     in PGO builds. So it's not necessarily from the PGO
     itself, but at least it means the current PGO builds
     really are better.

That's omni.ja funkyness with startup-cache, etc. Glad to see it still works. If the compiler was doing anything startup-smart to the binary, your fast system could probably startup in ~1s. Compilers do not care about startup(though there is interest among gcc people), so we have to do https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662397 & something similar on every platform


Experiment 2: JS benchmarks

   I ran SunSpider and V8. I would have run Kraken too, but
   it takes longer to run and I already had significant
   results by then. I did 1-2 runs. Below I show the average,
   rounded off to not show noise digits.

  results:
                      opt          pgo
   SunSpider          250          200      (seconds)
   V8                8900         9400      ("score")

   - Another clear win for PGO.


(Side note: I've recorded startup times for myself, with my normal profile, of 
~30 seconds. I assumed that was just normal, so today I looked on Telemetry and 
saw that only 5-8% of startup times are that long. (I wish I knew what % of 
cold startups that is.) Today's results were with a clean profile, so it seems 
like my normal profile must be busting my startups (and others') badly. It 
would be really nice to make startup time independent of profile.)
you can measure what goes wrong in your profile with work going-on in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=799638

That's really great that you have such a repeatable+slow profile. I never had the pleasure of having a fast machine that can start firefox this slowly.

Taras



_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to