On 04/23/13 10:21 PM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: > On 13-04-23 19:21 , Nicholas Nethercote wrote: >> - The 'inbound was closed for 15.3068% of the total time due to >> "bustage"' number is an underestimate, in one sense. When inbound is >> closed at 10am California time, it's a lot more inconvenient to >> developers than when it's busted at midnight California time. More >> than 3x, according to >> http://oduinn.com/images/2013/blog_2013_02_pushes_per_hour.png. > > See my "note 3" under the "Inbound uptime" section. I used exactly that > graph to weight the inbound downtime and there wasn't a significant > difference. > >> - Getting agreement on a significant process change is really >> difficult. Is it possible to set up a repo where a few people can >> volunteer to try Kats' approach for a couple of weeks? That would >> provide invaluable experience and data. > > Yeah, there are plans afoot to try this, pending sheriff approval.
If you know what you want the repo to be called I'd advise filing a RelEng bug about it now and we can get it done without being in the critical path later on. You can also just ask for one of the twigs to be customized (https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/DisposableProjectBranches). _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
