Maybe, but also, generally speaking we shouldn't be using .idl files for b2g any more, at least not writing new ones. We should be implementing things with WebIDL. What's the case where we need/want this here?
On 7/30/2013 7:51 AM, Andreas Gal wrote: > > Yeah, I just saw that grepping through the tree. Both completely > independent, too. On the upside, this might solve Jan's problem. > > Andreas > > Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 7/30/13 7:36 AM, Andreas Gal wrote: >>> For that we would have to implement Promise via IDL. Definitely >>> possible. All you need is a bit IDL and some JS that implements it. It >>> would be a lot slower than the jsm since it wraps into C++ objects that >>> call into JS, but in most cases that doesn't really matter. >> >> Wait. Why do we have multiple Promise implementations now? :( >> >> -Boris >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform -- jst _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
