On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Ralph Giles <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-10-28 2:11 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
>>   API for Media Resources 1.0
>>   http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-api-1.0/
...
> Thus I think we can be positive about this recommendation

I would prefer to abstain or otherwise not endorse this specification
for the following reasons:
 * It doesn't appear to integrate with HTML element interfaces and
media fetching algorithms.
 * It seems unnecessary to standardize an API of this level of
abstraction for Web apps that access server-side metadata repositories
that are affiliated with the entity that serves the JavaScript
program. The JavaScript program might as well have
application-specific code.
 * This API appears to have Java-oriented bits and doesn't embrace the
latest JS WebIDL API design thinking.
 * The API has a synchronous version.
 * There are RDF-style URI type identifiers.
 * It's not clear that this API would suit our use cases e.g. in
Firefox OS gallery or music player.

I would reply "abstain" and "don't plan to implement" for this API and
on the XML related specs in this batch.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
[email protected]
http://hsivonen.fi/
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to