On 12/2/2013, 2:36 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
On 11/29/13, 7:39 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
I think it's time, 9 days before the merge, to think about whether we
want unified builds to ride the train or not. I'm almost tempted to
suggest that we disable unified builds on nightlies, but that would
probably hide the problems even more.

I don't think Mike's original question has been discussed in this
thread: should we disable unified builds for Aurora 28? I think it is a
good idea because there are still open questions about unified build
code and stability issues (though Aurora will then hit the non-unified
build problems right away).

I discussed this with Mike on IRC last Friday, and have thought about this a bit more since then, and I believe that we should disable unified builds on mozilla-aurora and all branches past that point, perhaps indefinitely. Unified builds don't really buy us that much for code that gets compiled on those branches anyway, and if developers want to have them locally then they can always pref it on in their mozconfigs.

I filed this as bug 945496.

As for identifying broken non-unified builds, can we configure one of
our mozilla-inbound platforms to be non-unified (like 32-bit Linux Debug)?

I think the answer to that question depends on how soon bug 942167 can be fixed. Chris, any ideas?

Thanks!
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to