On 22/05/2014 18:29, Anthony Jones wrote: > Some of you may remember the discussion on clang-format and the `mach > clang-format` command. What we have in place right now is very temporary > but it is functional enough to give it a try. I have not put the effort > into upstreaming my changes. Depending on the feedback I receive I will > either: > > * Finish my existing changes and upstream them > * Remove the `mach clang-format` command altogether > * Do nothing > > I have personally found it useful. However I would like to hear from > other people who have tried it to help me decide what to do next. > I think that is great and you should keep working upstream. It would be great to have an --mozilla option in clang-format (especially since Javascript support is getting better in clang-format) and start to use it more in our projects. This would save some reviews steps in some patches.
Cheers, Sylvestre _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
