----- Original Message -----
> > Strawman idea: add support for:
> >
> >    mach check-syntax <directory>...
> 
> That will do nothing to reduce the overhead of the build system.  Most
> of the errors that Bill is talking about can be found the first time the
> code is exercised by the compiler, so removing the codegen won't help
> all that much.

No argument there.  But if faster builds require that we can't support 
per-directory rebuilds, this proposal means that (some) existing (C/C++, at 
least) workflows can be salvaged.  Why overload the concept of "build" when you 
can specify exactly what you want to have happen?

I'm not claiming this helps make things faster in any way.

-Nathan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to