+1
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Seth Fowler <s...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Yes, looks like it is! It’s not explicitly spelled out though - someone
> searching for “initializer list”, say, won’t find it. At a minimum it seems
> worth adding an explicit mention in the text.
>
> - Seth
>
> > On Dec 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Nicholas Nethercote <n.netherc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Seth Fowler <s...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> >> So I noticed that we don’t say anything about initializer list
> formatting in our coding style guide. I’d like to propose that we
> standardize this formatting:
> >>
> >> Foo::Foo(int aBar, char aBaz)
> >> : mBar(aBar)
> >> , mBaz(aBaz)
> >> {
> >> ….
> >> }
> >
> > This is already present in the example at
> >
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#Classes
> :
> >
> > class MyClass
> > : public X // when deriving from more than one class, put each on its
> own line
> > , public Y
> > {
> > public:
> > MyClass()
> > : mVar(0)
> > , mVar2(0)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> > ...
> > };
> >
> > Nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
