As one of the primary people sheriffing alerts, I have found that we get decisions made much faster as a result of this policy. I would be interested to hear if others have differing opinions as I could be seeing this with tunnel vision.
-Joel On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Old thread but now that we're 3 months into 2015, has this new policy been > effective at getting perf regressions fixed or at least deliberately > accepted? > > Lawrence > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:33 PM, <jma...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Great questions folks. >> >> :bsmedberg has answered the questions quite well, let me elaborate: >> Before a bug can be marked as resolved:fixed we need to verify the >> regression is actually fixed. In many cases we will fix a large portion of >> the regression and accept the small remainder. >> >> We do keep track of all the bugs filed per version (firefox 36 example: >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1084461) >> >> these get looked at more specifically during each uplift. >> >> I will update the verbage next week to call out how these will be >> followed up and posted to: >> https://www.mozilla.org/hacking/regression-policy.html >> >> Do speak up if this should be posted elsewhere or linked from a specific >> location. >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >> > > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
