Trevor> One might wish to mark Foo::IsAFoo override so the compiler Trevor> checks it shadows Base::IsAFoo but both are still non virtual.
Yes, I agree, one might. But that doesn't really have any bearing on the present. Right now, override is defined as only making sense on virtual functions. And, I think we should only develop using the language we have -- not hypothetical future changes to the language. Plus, we have automated rewriting tools. If we're positing that C++ might change in this way, then I think it's equally valid to posit that the tools will also change appropriately. Tom _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
