It looks like most of the Security discussion is happening in this bug now:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907707

--Jet

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Eric Shepherd <esheph...@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Eric Rescorla wrote:
> >
> > I think there are some fairly obvious issues here, including:
> >
> > - There are obvious sensitive files you shouldn't upload under
> >   basically any conditions.
> > - It's hard for the client to know what the implications of any directory
> > upload are
> >   because they may not know what's in a given directory.
> >
> > I'm not a big fan of "the user is stupid and we have to protect him" as
> an
> > argument. :)
> >
>
> Conveniently, that's not what I said. There's lots of stuff that's in
> people's directories
> that they're not readily aware of, including dotfiles, missaves, etc.
>
>
>
> > There are a lot of genuinely valid use cases for this feature; yes,
> > security concerns should definitely be considered, but it's important to
> be
> > clear that if you want to address security concerns, or kill off the
> > feature entirely.
> >
>
> What's needed here is a real security assessment. That might lead to some
> sort of security mediations, and might also lead to the conclusion that it
> needs
> to be killed. But the first thing to do is an assessment. So far I haven't
> seen
> one.
>
> -Ekr
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to