On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Steve Fink <sf...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> For the second one, it feels like a bit of a scary amount of complication > in order to avoid seeing distracting code during a typical grep, but it > also feels like a good pragmatic way to minimize the distraction caused by > c-c's presence in the repo. > > I can see that this might not be a satisfactory outcome to someone who > just wants to pull the trigger and merge it all in so they can get cracking > on build system improvements, without waiting on these annoying tooling > considerations. But if so, why aren't the continued arguments focused on > addressing BDS's (semi-)requirements? [note that gps *did* respond to the > sparse checkout portion; is the current state of that support satisfactory? > That's the blocking question here.] > Question: Would we actually need sparse checkouts? What if c-c was just a branch in the repo with extra stuff, which periodically took merges from m-c? _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
