Then I'm not sure why you need the gecko sdk to build it. On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:19 AM, <ales.rozman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, November 8, 2015 at 4:07:22 PM UTC+1, Dave Townsend wrote: > > As of Firefox 41 we no longer support loading binary components from > > add-ons. > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:44 AM, <ales.rozman...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > I am developing firefox addon with a binary component, and until > recently > > > i was using xulrunner-sdk for linking with required libs. As of > version 42 > > > xulrunner-sdk is no longer published. I read in a blog post ( > > > > http://hearsum.ca/blog/mozilla-will-stop-producing-automated-builds-of-xulrunner-after-the-410-cycle.html > ) > > > that mozilla will publish gecko-sdk with every release. > > > > > > I am wondering where is gecko-sdk published for version 42. I checked > on > > > https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/ but couldn't find it. > > > > > > In the meantime i built firefox myself from source (on windows). With > the > > > libs in /dist/sdk/lib and headers in /dist/include i was able to > compile > > > and build my addon. > > > > > > It would be nice if sdk would be published, so i wouldn't have to build > > > firefox myself for every version and every os. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Aleš > > > _______________________________________________ > > > dev-platform mailing list > > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > > > I'm using js-ctypes to load and use binary (dll), so it's not a xpcom > component. As i understand that is still allowed. Well it works on FF42 > anyway. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
