On Monday 2016-01-25 11:35 -0500, Mike Conley wrote: > Just be sure to file them. Having talked to the MozReview team about these > types of bugs, I do know that trust-worthiness of diffs and interdiffs is > very much a thing that we should be able to take for granted. Any bugs in > diff and interdiff trust-worthiness are high-priority to fix.
It's not clear to me that making trustworthy interdiffs across rebases is a thing that can be done given the current UI for showing diffs, since it's not clear to me that it shows enough information. I regularly do diffs of diffs (producing double-diffs that have two columns of +/-/<space> before the code rather than one), and I've gotten used to reading them. It's not clear to me how to explain interdiffs in a reliable and trustworthy way without that much metadata about the changes. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
