Does this mean that the default behavior in the main-thread FFI case is to
abort the process in a way that invokes the crash reporter? Because I think
that (along with zero-overhead) what Henri (and I) want.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:45 AM, <acrich...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Hello! I do agree it is indeed bad to spawn a new thread for all calls
> into Rust :). You likely don't want a custom panic handler [1], however, as
> those are actually more appropriately called "hooks" (just renamed [2]).
>
> Instead, the `std::panic::recover` function [3] is what you'll want for
> the FFI use case. This is essentially a "catch" block which will prevent
> the panic from aborting the process and allow you to handle the case that
> the code panicked properly (for example poisoning state, propagating the
> error to C++, etc). This way you avoid spawning a thread for all calls into
> Rust and it's far cheaper to create a stack frame to catch a panic.
>
> This function is currently unstable, but it is up for stabilization [4] in
> the 1.9 release (perhaps with a new name). It should be available
> immediately on nightly for experimenting, however.
>
> Let me know if that doesn't make sense or if you need any more info!
>
> [1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30449
> [2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32282
> [3]: http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/panic/fn.recover.html
> [4]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27719
>
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 6:04:25 AM UTC-7, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> > It seems that the Rust MP4 parser is run a new Rust-created thread in
> > order to catch panics. Once we introduce Rust code that intermingles
> > with C++ more, it won't be practical to put all potentially panicing
> > Rust code into dedicated threads.
> >
> > Can we install a custom panic function that detects whether it's
> > running on a Rust-created thread and performs a normal Rust panic if
> > it is and performs a MOZ_CRASH if not (i.e. if it is on a
> > non-Rust-created thread)?
> >
> > --
> > Henri Sivonen
> > hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
> > https://hsivonen.fi/
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to