On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <j...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Our original intent behind those choices was to let users join a video > conference as an "audio only" participant. Unfortunately, sites don't expect > this behavior and often don't work right when the track is missing.
This part should be fixable by creating a video stream which just contains black (or a "anonymous user" icon or some such). Of course, the UI would not be ideal since it would likely look different than if the user face-mutes in-app. So if the spec uses a different syntax for allowing the user to face-mute, which can be turned on/off at any time, then implementing that mechanism and hooking into that does indeed sound better. Is that what you're referring to with the last paragraph in the original post? / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
