Perhaps we can exercise restraint on doing a wholesale removal of the <10.9 code, as doing so could make uplifting to 48 and earlier more of a mess. Maybe in a few weeks? — - Milan
> On May 31, 2016, at 11:16 , Benjamin Smedberg <benja...@smedbergs.us> wrote: > > Yes. > > --BDS > > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Chris Pearce <cpea...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> So, given that users won't be able to install Firefox on unsupported >> versions of MacOSX, and unsupported users won't be upgraded, can we proceed >> to remove all the nsCocoaFeatures::On[Mountain]LionOrLater() calls in >> Firefox 49 and just assume everywhere that MacOSX specific Gecko code is >> running on 10.9 or later? >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Ralph Giles <gi...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:37 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> >> wrote: >>> >>>> There's a screenshot in: >>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1255588#c8 (and #c9) >>>> (which is the bug that made the necessary changes for the Mac OS X >>>> support change in Firefox 49). >>> >>> Ah, that's great. Thanks! >>> >>> -r >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
