On Thursday 2016-09-29 10:42 +0200, Ms2ger wrote: > On 29/09/16 03:02, L. David Baron wrote: > > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > > > Web Platform Working Group (formerly Web Applications WG & HTML WG) > > https://www.w3.org/2016/08/web-platform-charter-draft.html > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0001.html > > > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > > this Friday, September 30. > > > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should > > support or oppose it.
> Given that (as I expected) the merger of the HTML WG with its profoundly > dysfunctional processes into the productive WebApps WG created a > completely useless WG, more focused on adding W3C logos to existing > standards than doing actual work, my proposal is to disband this WG and > move any remaining useful work to the WHATWG. I don't think suggesting that would be particularly productive. Also, has the quality of the work that was previously in Web Apps degraded significantly? (At least, more than would be expected as a result of the departure of one of the Web Apps group's chairs?) If you think it has, how would you show that it has? -David -- ๐ L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ ๐ ๐ข Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ ๐ Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
