Le jeudi 15 décembre 2016 10:47:28 UTC+1, masayuki nakano a écrit : > So, it might be better to stop supporting multiple selection only in > editor if the feature is not so loved by users.
We were already discussing this issue at Netscape 15 years ago but could not come up with a good solution at that time. Thanks for bringing it back, this could be the right time to finally solve it. Some existing use cases: 1. this is absolutely needed for table cell selection. Everyone extensively using tables uses multiple selection at some point. 2. Microsoft Word on all platforms and in general all commercial Whysiwyg Text editors allow multiple selection. 3. multiple selection is really cool if you think of images representing videoframes you select to edit/crop a video. 4. "search a text" often ends with a multiple selection of all occurrences of the pattern in the document On another hand, I think selection would benefit from a boolean attribute saying if the rendering engine allows or not multiple selection and if it does not, having shortcut mechanisms allowing to get rid of the onmipresent and painful getRangeAt(0). We do quite equivalent things when the selection is collapsed. </Daniel> _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform