5 W3C Candidate Recommendations are available for the membership of W3C (including Mozilla) to vote on, before they proceed to the final stages of being a W3C Proposed Recommendation and W3C Recomendation:
deadline: Thursday, January 12, 2017 Activity Streams 2.0 https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ Activity Vocabulary https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/ Micropub https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/ Linked Data Notifications https://www.w3.org/TR/ldn/ ActivityPub https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the review, please say so in this thread. Ideally, such comments should link to github issues filed against the specification. (I'd note, however, that there have been previous opportunities to make comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first time at this stage, although that's a little less true now that the review is taking place against a CR rather than a PR.) I suspect Tantek is in support given that he's a co-chair of the working group. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
