On 2017-05-19 2:44 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
The Perfherder alerts and tracking are informational only: nobody will be
backing you out merely because you added a compiler warning. While the
possibility of doing that now exists, I view that decision as up to the C++
module. I'm not going to advocate for it. So if you feel passionately, take
it up with them :)
Always happy to see people find new and unanticipated uses for Perfherder.
Should performance sheriffs file bugs when they encounter regressions?
e.g. this "alert" https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=6673
has the underlying root cause:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1345368
I worry that filing a bug for every regression is going to be too much.
Will
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
