Btw, I believe that there is already support for reporting uncaught
errors and that it is blocked by the lack of test harness support.
Cheers,
David
On 18/10/17 19:37, Steve Fink wrote:
> My gut feeling is that you'd only want uncaught errors, and
> AutoJSAPI::ReportException is a better place than setPendingException. I
> don't know how common things like
>
> if (eval('nightlyOnlyFeature()')) { ... }
>
> are, but they certainly seem reasonable. And you'd have to do a bunch of
> work for every one to decide whether the catch was appropriate or not.
> It may be worth doing too, if you could come up with some robust
> whitelisting mechanisms, but at least starting with uncaught exceptions
> seems more fruitful.
>
> As for the Promise case, I don't know enough to suggest anything, but
> surely there's a way to detect those particular issues separately? Is
> there any way to detect if a finalized Promise swallowed an exception
> without "handling" it in some way or other, even if very heuristically?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
