For the curious among us, what made nsIURI not thread safe in the first place?

-Jeff

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Valentin Gosu <valentin.g...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Threadsafe URLs have been high on everybody's wishlist for a long while.
> The fact that our nsIURI implementations weren't thread safe meant that
> hacks had to be used to use a URI off the main thread, such as saving it as
> a string, or bouncing back to the main thread whenever you had to use the
> URI in any way.
>
> A few weeks ago we landed MozURL. This is an immutable threadsafe wrapper
> for rust-url. While it's not yet ready to fully replace our existing URL
> implementations, it's good enough to avoid using the hacks I just mentioned.
>
> For examples of how to use it go to the header file [1] or the gtests [2]
>
> Work is also under way to provide a threadsafe implementation of nsIURI
> that we eventually hope to replace our other URI parsers, and to improve
> the rust-url parser to be faster than our current nsStandardURL
> implementation [3].
>
> [1] http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/base/MozURL.h
> [2]
> http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/netwerk/test/gtest/TestMozURL.cpp
> [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1394906#c2
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to