On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:09 AM Martin Thomson <m...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 5:50 PM Henri Sivonen <hsivo...@mozilla.com> wrote: >> >> Do we know what the situation looks like for connections to RFC 1918 >> addresses? > > That's a hard one to even speculate about, and that's all we really have > there. Our telemetry doesn't really allow us to gain insight into that.
I see. > The big question being enterprise uses, where there is some chance of having > names on servers in private address space. Most use of 1918 outside of > enterprise is likely still unsecured entirely. I was thinking of home printer, NAS and router config UIs that are unsecured in the sense of using self-signed certificates but that still use TLS, so that TLS matters for practical compatibility. I don't know of real examples of devices that both use TLS exclusively and don't support TLS 1.2. (My printer redirects http to https with self-signed cert but supports TLS 1.2.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@mozilla.com _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
