I believe that this is the behavior specified by the CSSWG as well. From the spec <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-4/#cross-fade-function>:
> In particular, this means that `cross-fade(white 50%, transparent 50%)` will produce a partially-transparent solid white image. (Rather than a partially-transparent gray, which is what you’d get if you averaged the opaque white and transparent black pixels in non-premultiplied space.) Is that what you're pointing out? If not, if you could clarify I'd appreciate it so that we can make sure our implementations are consistent. On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:30 PM <aaai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Common implementations of crossfade just interpolate the opacity of both > images, leading to the background "leaking through" for a portion of the > fade. On a white background, this is a "flash". > > If this features gets traction, it is an opportunity to make the "right" > way the "easy" way. A crossfade between two opaque images, should always be > opaque. > > Good luck! Cheering from the sidelines! > > Let me know if I can clarify further. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
