On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 9:03 AM Gijs Kruitbosch <[email protected]>
wrote:

> When the advisory is published, is the information needed to write the
> description publicly available?  I.e., is the "reference to the bug on
> bugzilla" -- a link to the bug, I assume -- open so that a motivated
> individual could plausibly produce the description themselves?
>
> No. Advisories are published around the time the release goes out, and
> bugs (which typically contain a lot more detail about the specifics of the
> issue and the fix) are not opened up until users have broadly updated to
> builds containing the fix for the security issue. This is to avoid exposing
> users that are still on older builds to exploitation.
>
Thanks for clarifying, Gijs.  So: there is less information published, and
a justification for that reduction based on the effort involved.  Fine by
me!
Nick



> ~ Gijs
> On 13/05/2025 16:34, 'Nick Alexander' via [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hello sec team!
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 5:44 AM 'Frederik Braun' via
> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For those who don't know, we publish detailed security advisories
>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox/>
>> for every new Firefox release.
>> A typical advisory lists 10 to 20 security issues with a title, their
>> severity, the reporter and a description. Writing these advisories is a
>> cumbersome, manual process that takes too much time.
>>
>> We believe that this is not time well spent.
>> We don't believe that people should make their decisions whether to
>> update Firefox based on the individual CVEs that were fixed in a specific
>> release. As an evergreen product in a connected world, Firefox is only kept
>> secure if full browser updates are applied as soon as possible and not
>> weighed on the little information that we can include in our description.
>> People that *do* need more information and are building software
>> downstream of our source code may be nominated for our security group
>> <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/security-group/membership/>.
>> This group gets insights into the actual bugs and their fixes ahead of
>> release.
>> We will continue to make security bugs public once they have been fixed
>> and when a significant portion of our users had the chance to apply an
>> update. This typically happens a couple of months after the specific
>> release.
>>
>> As a result of these considerations, we would like to switch our security
>> advisory format to a simpler template that contains less details. We intend
>> to keep the following information: CVE-ID, Severity, Reporter, Title,
>> Component and a reference to the bug on bugzilla.
>>
>
> I am not so familiar with our sec process details.  When the advisory is
> published, is the information needed to write the description publicly
> available?  I.e., is the "reference to the bug on bugzilla" -- a link to
> the bug, I assume -- open so that a motivated individual could plausibly
> produce the description themselves?
>
> Thanks!
> Nick
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/firefox-dev/CAMnWBR0xEiorAnFGo6-Op3BZPdxMLxBvsZqmJfeTnuw_yxwLjQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/firefox-dev/CAMnWBR0xEiorAnFGo6-Op3BZPdxMLxBvsZqmJfeTnuw_yxwLjQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"[email protected]" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/CAMnWBR0Qem%2BrVE%2BypSg8FTtKfQjzqZmexJYCTf7oJo40jyYNcw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to