Agree that their is choice switch, but the choice seems to be yours (mozilla) and not the consumer which seems like your telling them they are to dumb to do this
Webster define's Choice the act of choosing power of choosing Basically saying the individual makes the choices Why can't Mozilla create a proper set-up wizard like IE that gives the consumer choice at install or upgrade? Seems harmless and not hard vs. you burying this chosen method and them not knowing that have choice. Again, I have no issues with blocking cookies whether first or third, but its how you NOT giving the user ability to choose for themselves. -Dennis On Apr 15, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Sid Stamm <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/11/13 10:20 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Blocking 3rd party cookies by default seems like "censoring" the >> Internet. I should have the choice by default, not Firefox. If >> Firefox does this, I will not use it anymore. Futhermore, when it >> comes to ads, I'd rather get an ad that I'm actually interested in. >> > > You still have the choice; we're not attempting to take that away. You > can turn third party cookies back on, or (in contrast) block all of > cookies if you want. You can even pick which sites are allowed to use > third-party cookies (though the UI for this is not quite awesome yet). > > -Sid > _______________________________________________ > dev-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-privacy > _______________________________________________ dev-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-privacy
