>> Rendering engine > Application name > Platform. Order of importance. > Would it not make more sense to keep them in the same order as now, to > improve compatibility? I have no emotional attachment to the order, just came up with that one as a personal preference.
>> Can I please get an example of a webpage that breaks as a result of >> UA header being "Gecko/31.0 Firefox/31.0 (Windows NT 6.1)" ? > I'm afraid it doesn't work like that. We don't have to disprove your > ideas. :-) You haven't given us any gains that we could expect to see > from the change, so it's not worth evaluating it. I am mainly asking for an example to see if my testing method is valid or not. When I setup my own webpage that specifically breaks when it detects the UA as being non-IE, then I obviusly get a nice diff image. But I found no such breakage in top 10000 (!) webpages, which is hard for me to believe, hence I need an example of a page that breaks. Reasoning for change of UA: 1) Decreasing the size of HTTP headers, so that all the headers combined fall below various thresholds (e.g. fitting into 1 packet, or fitting below certain size for proxies) can improve internet connectivity as a whole, especially when not using HTTP/2. 2) Removing things from UA, for all users of a browser, improves users' privacy by limiting identifiable fields. _______________________________________________ dev-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-privacy
