On 8/26/14, 12:17 PM, Chris Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Kathleen Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
The problem is that some BR audit statements provide information about the
CA's BR non-conformance that the CA considers to be sensitive (and
non-publishable) information.
What kind of information, specifically?
The way the CA was not complying with a BR, the RAs/subCAs involved, the
time period over which the problem existed.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
