Kathleen, is SECOM getting special treatment? I was wondering if there was some reason to move forward before a CA has everything in order? Will we be seeing more of this going forward?
Original Message From: Kathleen Wilson Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 4:26 PM On 11/9/15 3:54 PM, Kathleen Wilson wrote: > > I propose that we move forward with approving and implementing SECOM's > request to enable EV treatment for the the "Security Communication > RootCA2" root certificate that was included in NSS via Bugzilla Bug > #527419. > > In parallel, I plan to continue to track the action item for SECOM to > update their CP/CPS documentation to address the concerns that have been > raised. I believe that Ryan Sleevi is also planning to review the full > translated CP, but I am confident that SECOM will be prompt to address > any further concerns that are raised. > > I plan to track SECOM's status on updating their CP in the bug. > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096205 > > Does anyone have objections or concerns about this? > > Thanks, > Kathleen > Thanks again to everyone who reviewed and commented on this request from SECOM to enable EV treatment for the "Security Communication RootCA2" root certificate. I am now closing this discussion and will recommend approval in the bug. In parallel, I will also track the action item to finish the review of SECOM's translated CP/CPS and for SECOM to finish updating their CP/CPS (based on that review). https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096205 Any further follow-up on this request should be added directly to the bug. Thanks, Kathleen _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
