I like this one.

It will be very useful as a starting point if we finally get a CABF S/MIME
working
group, which is likely to happen.

-Tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev-security-policy [mailto:dev-security-policy-
> bounces+tim.hollebeek=digicert....@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Wayne
> Thayer via dev-security-policy
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 2:50 PM
> To: mozilla-dev-security-policy
<mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org>
> Subject: Policy 2.6 Proposal: Require disclosure of S/MIME validation
practices
> 
> Mozilla policy section 2.2(2) requires validation of email addresses for
S/MIME
> certificates, but doesn't require disclosure of these practices as it does
for TLS
> certificates.
> 
> I propose adding the following language from 2.2 (3) (TLS) to 2.2(2)
> (S/MIME):
> 
> The CA's CP/CPS must clearly specify the procedure(s) that the CA employs
to
> perform this verification.
> 
> This is: https://github.com/mozilla/pkipolicy/issues/114
> 
> -------
> 
> This is a proposed update to Mozilla's root store policy for version 2.6.
Please
> keep discussion in this group rather than on GitHub. Silence is consent.
> 
> Policy 2.5 (current version):
> https://github.com/mozilla/pkipolicy/blob/2.5/rootstore/policy.md
> _______________________________________________
> dev-security-policy mailing list
> dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to