On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 10:31:27 AM UTC-5, Wayne Thayer wrote: > DarkMatter has argued [3] that their CA business has always been operated > independently and as a separate legal entity from their security business. > Furthermore, DarkMatter states that once a rebranding effort is completed, > “the DarkMatter CA subsidiary will be completely and wholly separate from > the DarkMatter Group of companies in their entirety.” However, in the same > message, DarkMatter states that “Al Bannai is the sole beneficial > shareholder of the DarkMatter Group.” and leaves us to assume that Mr. Al > Bannai would remain the sole owner of the CA business. More recently, > DarkMatter announced that they are transitioning all aspects of the > business to DigitalTrust and confirmed that Al Bannai controls this entity. > This ownership structure does not assure me that these companies have the > ability to operate independently, regardless of their names and legal > structure.
I seek to better understand this aspect. Are we to infer that "Mr. Al Bannai" is banned from the program? Is there a list of named individuals who are banned? Will there be? Truly horrid organizations and/or individuals passively own all kinds of assets. A strong management team that can be trusted to keep commitments to sound the alarm if the organization goes off track is one way to address that. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
