I believe you’ve still implied, even in this reply, that this is something
serious or important. I see no reason to believe that is the case, and I
wasn’t sure if there was anything more than a “Here’s a SHOULD and here’s
people not doing it,” which doesn’t seem that useful to me.

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 2:52 PM Hanno Böck <ha...@hboeck.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2020 09:55:22 -0400
> Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
> <dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:
>
> > Could you please cite more specifically what you believe is wrong
> > here? This is only a SHOULD level requirement.
>
> I think I said that more or less:
>
> > > I'm not going to file individual reports for the CAs. Based on
> > > previous threads I don't believe these are strictly speaking rule
> > > violations.
>
> I'm not claiming this is a severe issue or anything people should be
> worried about.
> It's merely that while analyzing some stuff I observed that AIA fields
> aren't as reliable as one might want (see also previous mails) and the
> mime types are one more observation I made where things aren't what they
> probably SHOULD be.
> I thought I'd share this observation with the community.
>
> --
> Hanno Böck
> https://hboeck.de/
>
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to