Hi: Our inclusion request has been in public discussion since April 7. We have provided all requested information as a first-time root inclusion applicant. Kindly, we would like to move forward with our request and get your final feedback.
Regards. Syrine On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 10:33:41 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > I am pretty sure this is the correct link: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9228562 > > (Disregard the link to Facebook). > > Ben > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 1:01 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi >> >> We added a document with more details on TunTrust CA budget. See >> > https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057252566463. >> Regards >> Syrine >> >> >> >> Sent from my Galaxy >> > >> >> -------- Original message -------- >> From: Watson Ladd <[email protected]> >> Date: 2021-06-23 6:01 a.m. (GMT+01:00) >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Public Discussion re: Inclusion of the TunTrust Root CA >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 12:10:43 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: >> >>> All, >>> TunTrust has provided an overview of its compliance infrastructure, >>> which I have reviewed. See >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=9226817. I'm now asking >>> the community for further comments and responses to TunTrust's inclusion >>> request. >>> >> >> I'm not happy with the level of detail in this overview. While some >> answers are thorough, others are not detailed enough. For example the >> budget has no hard numbers at all. Obviously prediction is hard, but surely >> the past 3 years of spending could be included. >> >> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:21 AM Syrine Tlili <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All : >>>> >>>> We would like to move forward with our inclusion request in public >>>> discussion since April 7th 2021. Based on the public discussion thread [1] >>>> and on the new section “CA/Quantifying Value” [2], we have submitted a >>>> document in our Bugzilla case [3] that provides answers and clarifications >>>> on our CA. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/LT_5efOFsSU >>>> >>>> [2] https://m.wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Quantifying_Value >>>> >>>> [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1587779 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 7:20:45 PM UTC+1 [email protected] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> All, >>>>> Kathleen and I discussed iTrusChina's and TunTrust's root inclusion >>>>> applications this morning and agreed that we should extend the public >>>>> discussion period and leave them open for discussion beyond April 30th. >>>>> Meanwhile, I will work on follow-up questions for them regarding their >>>>> added value to users vs. added risk. >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:48 AM 'Syrine Tlili' via >>>>> [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 4:36:19 PM UTC+1 Andrew Ayer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 08:20:58 -0700 (PDT) >>>>>>> Syrine Tlili <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > We are automatically checking the CAA records for all the >>>>>>> certificate >>>>>>> > requests equally. We do not have affiliates and the only DNS >>>>>>> operator >>>>>>> > in Tunisia is the «Agence Tunisienne >>>>>>> > d’Internet» (https://www.ati.tn/ ; https://whois.ati.tn/ ). >>>>>>> Exception >>>>>>> > on checking CAA records does not apply to us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your CPS currently lists three exceptions where you might skip CAA >>>>>>> checking. If this is not accurate, it should be updated. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Andrew >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi: >>>>>> >>>>>> This section on CAA checking exceptions is now updated in our CP/CPS. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Syrine Tlili >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "[email protected]" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/3b85ce38-7809-49ff-a2a3-1a9c2a936c30n%40mozilla.org >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/3b85ce38-7809-49ff-a2a3-1a9c2a936c30n%40mozilla.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "[email protected]" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/topic/dev-security-policy/dTTp4ZfUW34/unsubscribe >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/54f7f7c8-0c5f-403f-bfa1-5a82e7718cbdn%40mozilla.org >> >> <https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/54f7f7c8-0c5f-403f-bfa1-5a82e7718cbdn%40mozilla.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/5070bef6-b41c-4900-95f0-141debcc0d1cn%40mozilla.org.
