I have emailed CAs in the Mozilla program asking them to respond here. On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:41 PM Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:00 PM Ben Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> See responses inline below. >> >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:12 PM Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It’s not clear: what situations make it appropriate for a CA >>> communication, versus discussion here? >>> >> >> Yes. It is preferable that discussion take place here. However, a survey >> would still be public, as they have been in the past, and the CCADB would >> collect all of the responses in a table format. >> > > Oh, for sure :) I just know that the surveys have historically had delays > or had confusion by CAs in interpreting questions, and the survey approach > somewhat predates the m.d.s.p. participation requirement. I totally realize > that it has benefits for bringing direct awareness, but I raise it to try > and understand if the expectation is to always have the two parallel paths > for soliciting feedback, or if it might just be sufficient to email blast > CAs to say "Hey, here's the discussion, to send feedback, please > participate here". That, I think, might achieve the goal of highlighting > the importance, while still centralizing some of the conversation :) Just a > thought > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CA%2B1gtab2Kvq5i%3D6bzPDaMpguUJFx68MMRSnJMw1s_HDCZ8X9rA%40mail.gmail.com.
