On Thu, 12 Jun 2025, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
Would that be allowed and also avoid revocation of your missed it? Could you put something in the CPS that said ?We endeavor perform everything as stated in this CPS but there May be slight deviations. If there?s any deviation from the CPS, we don?t revoke but offer a credit of X. We always revoke for noncompliance with the BRs. ?
I cannot make any definitive statements on whether that is allowed or not at this point, but I do think this might be worth exploring. If it is not allowed - CAs are seeking a rule change anyway, we could just allow this instead if it is not a currently allowed approach. Theoretically speaking.
And also it would probably not hurt to see if there will be any relevant discussion on the benefits and problems of such an approach. :)
Tobi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/25c2c3a9-f103-9546-d276-a8265fd02d49%40opera.com.
