Hello, I'm a grad student doing anti-phishing research and lately I've been comparing the performance of FF2 and FF3 with regard to site detection. FF2 has been substantially outperforming FF3 against our test set of phishing attacks (generally garnered from published online repositories of phishing attacks). Based on my outsider's perspective, I was under the impression that both relied on Google's Safebrowsing and was surprised by the disparity between versions. I am wondering if this is a generally observed phenomenon or if we are doing something odd in testing that could be causing it? If anyone has a chance to enlighten me, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks! Peter _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list dev-security@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
