On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:06:45 +0100 Gervase Markham wrote: > Unless it never works. If we announce we are not going to support this > hijacking of barewords, and perhaps get other browser vendors to join us > (I suspect Chrome would be keen; this is a problem for them) .
Where's this come from anyway, seems highly questionable that this has got past quick contemplation to me?? It would be quite cool to just have a word as a site. OTOH how would anyone know it was a url verbally or written. This happens with our .co what's your address blah.co ... .uk just .co ... .com no, just .co just .co yeah... it's the new company extension, it used to be columbia oh ok, cool. I imagine many if not all web forms validation will break for mail addresses too, some don't allow multiple @s which the spec allows. Some people had problems sending to our .co even, don't know what server it was, probably some exchange crap as it was a big company. I was surprised because it used to be columbias extension. _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list dev-security@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
